Jump To Navigation
  • Appeals court overturns the conviction of a defendant denied his Constitutional right to examine the computer evidence used against him in a criminal proceeding.
  • Jury acquits former Riverside police officer of all criminal charges relating to his brief detention of an individuals under investigation for threatening another.
  • Jury awards former Hamilton County employee $135,000 for claims of race discrimination and retaliation. The plaintiff's husband, the highest-ranking African American within the county's juvenile court, was fired after 22 years of service when, after learning he was being paid less than white employees at the same level, he filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC.
  • Jury finds UPS liable for workers compensation retaliation and age discrimination after the company fired a veteran employee just weeks after the employee filed a claim for an job-related injury. Employee ordered reinstated, awarded $330,000 in damages and attorneys fees.
  • Jury awards former corporate executive $875,000 after employer failed to compensate him as promised at the time of his hire.
  • Railroad, chemical company settle class action lawsuit filed by hundreds of Cincinnati-area residents forced to evacuate their homes due to an abandoned train tanker leaking a hazardous chemical in the air.
  • Ohio University alumni file class action lawsuit against after personal information of more than 200,000 alumni and students, including social security numbers, was left on an open server and hacked into for more than 15 months.
  • Veterans file class action lawsuit against United States Department of Veteran's Affairs after personal information of over 17 million veterans, including social security numbers and medical information, is stolen.
  • Ohio Secretary of State settles class action lawsuit over publication of social security numbers on its website and agrees to change its practices.
  • Former Cincinnati mayors file taxpayers lawsuit to force Hamilton County to honor its contracts over the stalled multi-million dollar Banks project.
  • Appeals court rules that woman's claims against Archdiocese of Cincinnati for forcing her to give up her child as a teenager after becoming impregnated by a priest should go forward.
  • Woman files class action against Hamilton County Clerk of Courts after her identity is stolen by criminals who obtained her personal information, including social security number, from the Clerk of Court's public website. Clerk of Courts changes publication practices just two days later.
  • Bank settles class action lawsuit on behalf of subcontractors not paid in connection with Erpenbeck fraud.
  • Cincinnati Bell settles class action lawsuit on behalf of customers improperly charged roaming fees.
  • City of Cincinnati pays $70,000 to Over-the-Rhine man after jury finds that police officer violated his Constitutional rights by entering his apartment without a warrant and physically arresting him for a minor misdemeanor noise violation.
  • Jury finds City of Covington unlawfully retaliated again former police officer when it filed him after filing a charge of disability discrimination with the EEOC.
Employment Law, Employee Center

Employment Law, Employee Center

The Hiring Process

Applicants for employment positions have rights whether or not they become employees. Under federal law, it is illegal for an employer to discriminate in its hiring process based on race, national origin, gender, pregnancy, age, disability or religion. State and local laws may specify additional protected classes based on categories such as sexual orientation. Employers must abide by anti-discrimination laws at each stage of the hiring process, from placing the ad to interviewing and the final selection of the candidate. There are few exceptions to these rules, but an employer may discriminate on some bases if a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) exists. A BFOQ can be based on a reasonable and necessary job requirement, but this is a narrow exception. If you are concerned about discrimination in hiring, contact an employment lawyer to discuss your situation.

Employer Interview Questions

Generally, employers should avoid asking questions that relate to the classes protected by discrimination laws. The following examples are the types of queries that are illegal for prospective employers to ask:

  • Whether the applicant has children or intends to have children
  • Applicant's marital status
  • Applicant's race
  • Applicant's religion
  • Applicant's age (other than inquiring whether over age of 18)
  • Whether applicant has a disability
  • Applicant's citizenship status
  • Questions about whether the applicant has ever had a drug or alcohol problem

An applicant may raise questions related to these areas during a job interview. If so, the employer may discuss these topics to the extent necessary to answer the applicant's questions.

Hiring Process

Whenever an employer seeks to hire a new employee, the employer should take a number of steps before that new employee begins work:

  • Obtain the employee's Social Security number or IRS Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN)
  • Have the employee fill out a W-4 form for income tax withholding
  • Ensure that Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) regulations are being followed
  • Arrange to pay relevant federal and state unemployment compensation taxes
  • Arrange to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes for the employee
  • Ensure that workers' compensation insurance covers the new employee
  • Ensure that required labor notices are posted in the workplace as required by the Department of Labor (DOL)
  • Assist new employee with registration for employee benefits

When an employer hires a new employee, the employer should be careful to avoid making promises to the employee that it may not be able to keep. Such false statements or promises on behalf of the employer may result in breach of contract. An employer should be careful not to exaggerate the security of the job or the prospects of the business. A promise that stock options will be worth a given amount, that the employee has a job for life or that employee will receive significant pay increases may result in an implied contract. If these promises are not kept, the employer may be responsible to the employee for damages the employee incurred in relying on the employer's promise.

Conclusion

An employer must be careful not to discriminate against an applicant on illegal grounds and must use caution in making promises to employees. If have any questions about these issues, an employment lawyer can help.

Copyright ©2009 FindLaw, a Thomson Business

DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent legal counsel for advice on any legal matter.

Return to Main

The Best Lawyers in America SuperLawyers