Jump To Navigation
  • Appeals court overturns the conviction of a defendant denied his Constitutional right to examine the computer evidence used against him in a criminal proceeding.
  • Jury acquits former Riverside police officer of all criminal charges relating to his brief detention of an individuals under investigation for threatening another.
  • Jury awards former Hamilton County employee $135,000 for claims of race discrimination and retaliation. The plaintiff's husband, the highest-ranking African American within the county's juvenile court, was fired after 22 years of service when, after learning he was being paid less than white employees at the same level, he filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC.
  • Jury finds UPS liable for workers compensation retaliation and age discrimination after the company fired a veteran employee just weeks after the employee filed a claim for an job-related injury. Employee ordered reinstated, awarded $330,000 in damages and attorneys fees.
  • Jury awards former corporate executive $875,000 after employer failed to compensate him as promised at the time of his hire.
  • Railroad, chemical company settle class action lawsuit filed by hundreds of Cincinnati-area residents forced to evacuate their homes due to an abandoned train tanker leaking a hazardous chemical in the air.
  • Ohio University alumni file class action lawsuit against after personal information of more than 200,000 alumni and students, including social security numbers, was left on an open server and hacked into for more than 15 months.
  • Veterans file class action lawsuit against United States Department of Veteran's Affairs after personal information of over 17 million veterans, including social security numbers and medical information, is stolen.
  • Ohio Secretary of State settles class action lawsuit over publication of social security numbers on its website and agrees to change its practices.
  • Former Cincinnati mayors file taxpayers lawsuit to force Hamilton County to honor its contracts over the stalled multi-million dollar Banks project.
  • Appeals court rules that woman's claims against Archdiocese of Cincinnati for forcing her to give up her child as a teenager after becoming impregnated by a priest should go forward.
  • Woman files class action against Hamilton County Clerk of Courts after her identity is stolen by criminals who obtained her personal information, including social security number, from the Clerk of Court's public website. Clerk of Courts changes publication practices just two days later.
  • Bank settles class action lawsuit on behalf of subcontractors not paid in connection with Erpenbeck fraud.
  • Cincinnati Bell settles class action lawsuit on behalf of customers improperly charged roaming fees.
  • City of Cincinnati pays $70,000 to Over-the-Rhine man after jury finds that police officer violated his Constitutional rights by entering his apartment without a warrant and physically arresting him for a minor misdemeanor noise violation.
  • Jury finds City of Covington unlawfully retaliated again former police officer when it filed him after filing a charge of disability discrimination with the EEOC.
Employment Law, Employee Center

Employment Law, Employee Center

Frequently Asked Questions about Employment Law for the Employee

Q: What laws must employers follow when hiring new employees?

A: A prospective employer must avoid any illegal discrimination based on race, national origin, gender, pregnancy, age, disability or religion during the hiring process. Employers should also be sure to protect the privacy rights of applicants by protecting confidential or private information provided by the applicant and by disclosing to the applicant any background or credit checks that the employer wishes to perform. Employers are required to follow all applicable documentation rules regarding immigration and take care not to discriminate against applicants over 40 because of their age.

Q: Can employers monitor their employees' Internet usage or read their e-mails?

A: The Supreme Court has found that employees have very limited rights to privacy in their employers' computer systems. Employers may monitor Web sites visited by their employees and may block their employees from visiting certain Web sites. Employers can also limit employees' Internet usage to business-related Web sites. If the employer has a company policy that its computer systems are to be used only for work-related activities, it may reprimand or punish an employee who used its equipment for personal purposes. E-mails are considered to be company property if they are sent using the company e-mail system, and many employers monitor or archive all incoming and outgoing e-mails sent through their systems.

Q: Can employers listen in on their employees' phone conversations at work or to their voice mail messages in the company voice mail system?

A: Under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), an employer may monitor its employees' business-related telephone usage at work. Under the ECPA, an employer typically may not monitor an employee's personal phone calls, even those made from telephones on work premises. An employer may monitor a personal call only if an employee knows the particular call is being monitored and consents to it. The ECPA also provides that an employer may not intercept an employee's voice mail, but it may be able to access voice mail messages that are in "electronic storage."

Q: What laws regulate the wages and hours in my workplace?

A: The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is the main federal law governing minimum wage, overtime pay and child labor. It applies to most employers, including the federal government, state and local governments and most private employers. The FLSA does not regulate matters like sick time, vacations, severance pay or breaks.

Q: How can I tell if I am an independent contractor?

A: Independent contractors usually work with a business or individual on a project-by-project basis pursuant to a written contract. Businesses do not deduct federal or state taxes, social security taxes or unemployment compensation taxes from their payments to independent contractors. If you are an independent contractor, companies are not your employers; they are your clients. As clients, they are not entitled to direct your work process. They have the right, however, to set out specifications for performance, or approval may be provided for in the independent contractor agreement. Independent contractors have the right to decide where and how the project should be completed.

Q: Is it ever acceptable for an employer to consider someone's disability during the hiring process?

A: An employer may describe the qualifications necessary to perform the position but may not ask whether the prospective employee has a disability that may affect his or her ability to perform the job. If the prospective employee indicates that he or she has a disability that may require accommodation, the employer may ask what types of accommodations would allow the prospective employee to perform the essential functions of the job.

Q: How do workers go about attempting to gain union representation?

A: Qualified workers may petition the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to conduct a secret ballot election in the workplace to determine if union representation is desired. If the election conducted by the NLRB indicates the workers have a desire to be represented by a qualified labor representative in collective bargaining with their employer, union representatives may conduct a meeting to discuss organizing. An employer cannot interfere with any part of the union organization process.

Q: What is the difference between "at-will" employment and employment based on a contract?

A: At-will employment means that the employee can be let go at any time as long as the reason is not based on illegal discrimination or other illegal grounds. The at-will employee can also quit at any time. An employment relationship that is contractually based, however, is governed by the terms of the contract and the applicable laws. The contract may dictate the employee can only be fired for cause.

Copyright ©2009 FindLaw, a Thomson Business

DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent legal counsel for advice on any legal matter.

Return to Main

The Best Lawyers in America SuperLawyers